Reverse the conditions of personal
Proof
1 - proof of divorce denial.
Modify some conditions of the legislature and litigation procedures in personal status matters not to be invoked in the proof of divorce when the denial is not Balachhad and documentation. M 21 / 1 of S 1 for 2000 uncertain. Stay on the subjective norm, which included material 5.6 of s 462 of year 1955.280 of the Rules of legitimacy. Its impact. Non-applicability of the rule amendment to the cases brought before its promulgation.
(Appeal No. 455 for the year 70 BC, "personal status" Session 08/02/2003)
2 - in matters of personal status
Martyrdom of contesting a witness a Christian before the Court of First Instance does not prevent them from enabling them to prove its defense properly agreed with the approach of Forensic Court of Appeal. Elimination of the impugned decision denying claims of a full-blown evidence legitimacy in the proof of damage whereby it is permissible for divorce to marry another and taking notice of the court on demand up refer the case to the piercing of the investigation to prove its defense on the face legitimate right. Contesting is not facing the defense or request does not contain nothing to justify the rejection. Its impact. Failure and cause prejudice to the right of defense
(Appeal No. 242 of the year 70 BC, "personal status" - a session 26/10/2002)
Divorce
Wife's right to file a new divorce of the damage. The police. Be based on facts other than those who filed the first suit on the basis of which to pay for the damage claimed and the occurrence during the married life. Not required for the establishment of a wife with her husband. Violation of the impugned decision and decree of this review a dismissal for lack of convergence of the wife with her husband, a fact or a ruling to dismiss the case after the first. Shortcomings and mistakes in the application of the law.
(Appeal No. 115 of the year 70 BC, "personal status" Session 10/26/2002)
Show Magistrate
Commitment to offer Magistrate Court twice in the case of children of pre-judgment of divorce, or divorce. 18 BC to AD 2000, violation of that. Uncertain breaking the law. This bug. Seeking to reform an essential closely to public order. Its impact. The Court of Cassation has to offer on its own. Elimination of the court of first degree divorce without displaying the peace and view of the Court of Appeal once despite the presence of children. A mistake.
(Appeal No. 518 of 71 s "personal status" Session 22/02/2003)
Pleasure
Exemption claims expenses and similar expenses and wages of all legal fees. The receipt for a few. , M 3 of Law No. 1 of 2000 to organize some of the situations and litigation procedures in personal status matters. Lawsuit pleasure do not fall within this exemption. This bug. Its impact. Appellant's commitment to the deposit guarantee.
(Appeal No. 375 for the year 70 BC, "personal status" Session 27/09/2003)
Change the denomination or denominations
Change the community or denomination 1 - based on the challenged to prove its case against her in divorce, the appellant has voluntarily isolated in accordance with Islamic law, based on testimony provided by them and issued by the Archdiocese of Mount Lebanon to the Syriac Orthodox Church under the presidency to provide the benefits of this community to join. Significance of the impugned decision of these certificates in community change. Error and corruption in reasoning. Does not detract from the adoption of these certificates from the Egyptian embassy in Beirut or the ratification of the Egyptian Foreign Ministry that bug. (Appeal No. 519 for the year 68 BC (the conditions of personal hearing 10.21.2002) 2 - Egyptian non-Muslims defiant sect or denomination, who have had judicial bodies Mlah organization until 12/31/1955. Disputes relating to personal status of their own. Judgments where According to their religion, while not contrary to public order. Article 3 / 2 of the Act 1 of 2000 on the organization of some of the conditions and procedures for litigation in matters of Personal Status. (appeal No. 738 of 71 s "personal status" Session 24/05/2003) annulment of marriage
Proof
1 - proof of divorce denial.
Modify some conditions of the legislature and litigation procedures in personal status matters not to be invoked in the proof of divorce when the denial is not Balachhad and documentation. M 21 / 1 of S 1 for 2000 uncertain. Stay on the subjective norm, which included material 5.6 of s 462 of year 1955.280 of the Rules of legitimacy. Its impact. Non-applicability of the rule amendment to the cases brought before its promulgation.
(Appeal No. 455 for the year 70 BC, "personal status" Session 08/02/2003)
2 - in matters of personal status
Martyrdom of contesting a witness a Christian before the Court of First Instance does not prevent them from enabling them to prove its defense properly agreed with the approach of Forensic Court of Appeal. Elimination of the impugned decision denying claims of a full-blown evidence legitimacy in the proof of damage whereby it is permissible for divorce to marry another and taking notice of the court on demand up refer the case to the piercing of the investigation to prove its defense on the face legitimate right. Contesting is not facing the defense or request does not contain nothing to justify the rejection. Its impact. Failure and cause prejudice to the right of defense
(Appeal No. 242 of the year 70 BC, "personal status" - a session 26/10/2002)
Divorce
Wife's right to file a new divorce of the damage. The police. Be based on facts other than those who filed the first suit on the basis of which to pay for the damage claimed and the occurrence during the married life. Not required for the establishment of a wife with her husband. Violation of the impugned decision and decree of this review a dismissal for lack of convergence of the wife with her husband, a fact or a ruling to dismiss the case after the first. Shortcomings and mistakes in the application of the law.
(Appeal No. 115 of the year 70 BC, "personal status" Session 10/26/2002)
Show Magistrate
Commitment to offer Magistrate Court twice in the case of children of pre-judgment of divorce, or divorce. 18 BC to AD 2000, violation of that. Uncertain breaking the law. This bug. Seeking to reform an essential closely to public order. Its impact. The Court of Cassation has to offer on its own. Elimination of the court of first degree divorce without displaying the peace and view of the Court of Appeal once despite the presence of children. A mistake.
(Appeal No. 518 of 71 s "personal status" Session 22/02/2003)
Pleasure
Exemption claims expenses and similar expenses and wages of all legal fees. The receipt for a few. , M 3 of Law No. 1 of 2000 to organize some of the situations and litigation procedures in personal status matters. Lawsuit pleasure do not fall within this exemption. This bug. Its impact. Appellant's commitment to the deposit guarantee.
(Appeal No. 375 for the year 70 BC, "personal status" Session 27/09/2003)
Change the denomination or denominations
Change the community or denomination 1 - based on the challenged to prove its case against her in divorce, the appellant has voluntarily isolated in accordance with Islamic law, based on testimony provided by them and issued by the Archdiocese of Mount Lebanon to the Syriac Orthodox Church under the presidency to provide the benefits of this community to join. Significance of the impugned decision of these certificates in community change. Error and corruption in reasoning. Does not detract from the adoption of these certificates from the Egyptian embassy in Beirut or the ratification of the Egyptian Foreign Ministry that bug. (Appeal No. 519 for the year 68 BC (the conditions of personal hearing 10.21.2002) 2 - Egyptian non-Muslims defiant sect or denomination, who have had judicial bodies Mlah organization until 12/31/1955. Disputes relating to personal status of their own. Judgments where According to their religion, while not contrary to public order. Article 3 / 2 of the Act 1 of 2000 on the organization of some of the conditions and procedures for litigation in matters of Personal Status. (appeal No. 738 of 71 s "personal status" Session 24/05/2003) annulment of marriage
المستشار القانوني إبراهيم خليل
محام بالنقض والدستورية والإدارية العليا
عضو اتحاد المحامين العرب
عضو الجمعية المصرية للقانون الدولي
عضو جمعية الضرائب المصرية
عضو جمعية إدارة الأعمال العربية والأستاذ خالد إبراهيم المحامي بالاستئناف
موبيل 01005225061 - 01021141410
القاهرة مصر
ساحة النقاش