No Vowels. (No: A - E - I - O - U - Y).
Each letter is silent.
All letters are silent. (A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z).
Let us take the letter (F):
Is it (F) a silent letter?
Yes it (F) is a silent letter.
Can it (F) be pronouced alone?
No, it (F) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Eff) is saying the name of the letter (F).
So the word (Eff) is not the pronounciation of the letter (F).
saying (Fa) is a pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Fe) is a pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Fo) is a pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Far); the two letters (Fa) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Fed); the two letters (Fe) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (F) accompgnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Ford); the two letters (Fo) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (H):
Is it (H) a silent letter?
Yes it (H) is a silent letter.
Can it (H) be pronouced alone?
No, it (H) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Etch) is saying the name of the letter (H).
So the word (Etch) is not the pronounciation of the letter (H).
saying (Ha) is a pronounciation of the letter (H) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (He) is a pronounciation of the letter (H) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Ho) is a pronounciation of the letter (H) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Hat); the two letters (Ha) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (H) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Her); the two letters (He) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (H) accompgnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Hot); the two letters (Ho) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (H) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (L):
Is it (L) a silent letter?
Yes it (L) is a silent letter.
Can it (L) be pronouced alone?
No, it (L) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Ell) is saying the name of the letter (L).
So the word (Ell) is not the pronounciation of the letter (L).
saying (La) is a pronounciation of the letter (L) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Le) is a pronounciation of the letter (L) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Lo) is a pronounciation of the letter (L) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Lap); the two letters (La) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (L) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Led); the two letters (Le) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (L) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Lord); the two letters (Lo) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (L) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (M):
Is it (M) a silent letter?
Yes it (M) is a silent letter.
Can it (M) be pronouced alone?
No, it (M) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Emm) is saying the name of the letter (M).
So the word (Emm) is not the pronounciation of the letter (M).
saying (Ma) is a pronounciation of the letter (M) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Me) is a pronounciation of the letter (M) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Mo) is a pronounciation of the letter (M) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Man); the two letters (Ma) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (M) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Men); the two letters (Me) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (M) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Most); the two letters (Mo) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (M) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (N):
Is it (N) a silent letter?
Yes it (N) is a silent letter.
Can it (N) be pronouced alone?
No, it (N) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Enn) is saying the name of the letter (N).
So the word (Enn) is not the pronounciation of the letter (N).
saying (Na) is a pronouncation of the letter (N) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Ne) is a pronounciation of the letter (N) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (No) is a pronounciation of the letter (N) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Nab); the two letters (Na) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (N) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Neck); the two letters (Ne) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (N) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Not); the two letters (No) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (N) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (S):
Is it (S) a silent letter?
Yes it (S) is a silent letter.
Can it (S) be pronouced alone?
No, it (S) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Ess) is saying the name of the letter (S).
So the word (Ess) is not the pronounciation of the letter (S).
Saying (Sa) is a pronounciation of the letter (S) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Se) is a pronounciation of the letter (S) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (So) is a pronounciation of the letter (S) accompagned with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Sad); the two letters (Sa) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (S) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Set); the two letters (Se) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (S) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Sort); the two letters (So) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (S) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (W):
Is it (W) a silent letter?
Yes it (W) is a silent letter.
Can it (W) be pronouced alone?
No, it (W) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Dubble u) is saying the name of the letter (W).
So the word (Double u) is not the pronounciation of the letter (W).
saying (Wa) is a pronounciation of the letter (W) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (We) is a pronounciation of the letter (W) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Wo) is a pronounciation of the letter (W) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Wax); the two letters (Wa) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (W) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Web); the two letters (We) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (W) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Word); the two letters (Wo) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (W) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (Z):
Is it (Z) a silent letter?
Yes it (Z) is a silent letter.
Can it (Z) be pronouced alone?
No, it (Z) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Zedd) is saying the name of the letter (Z).
So the word (Zedd) is not the pronounciation of the letter (Z).
saying (Za) is a pronounciation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Ze) is a pronounciation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Zo) is a pronounciation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Zap); the two letters (Za) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Zest); the two letters (Ze) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Zord); the two letters (Zo) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
And so on.
Now let us take the word - Apple - and compare it with the word - Far - .. so, the first letter of the word - Far - is the letter - F -accompagnied with the sound-1, and the wrong dealing with this word was by adding the letter - A - to express the sound-1. While the first letter of the word Apple is the letter - A - accompagnied with the same sound-1 and not with a letter - A - to express the vowel-1, otherwise the word - Apple - was suppose to be - AApple - with the first letter - A - like the first letter - F - of the word - Far - and the second letter - A - in the word - AApple - to express the sound-1 like the second letter of the word - Far - which is to express the sound-1 by mistake.
So the word - Apple - is correct without adding an assumed sound-1 and the word - Far - is to be - Fr - with a simbol for the first letter - F -.
(Let us take the word - End (not .. EEnd) -which is without adding a letter to express the sound-2
Let us take the word - Orange (not .. OOrange) - which is without adding a letter to express the sound-3
***
Now .. Now .. Now ...
All the system of English has to be developed by writing the letters as letters and expressing the sound-1 with a symbol.
All the system of English has to be developed by writing the letters as letters and expressing the sound-2 with a symbol.
All the system of English has to be developed by writing the letters as letters and expressing the sound-3 with a symbol.
And so on.
No Vowels (No: A - E - I - O - U - Y).
Each letter is silent.
All letters are silent (A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z).
Mohamed Ben Hassan Ben Mahmoud Ben Moustafa Ben Ahmed Ben Ahmed Albadawy
محمد بن حسن بن محمود بن مصطفى بن احمد بن احمد البدوي
Published 03 december 2017 Sunday 14.03.1439
Edited 03 december 2017 Sunday 14.03.1439
Note:
I accept any seious translating corrections. Please contact
***
Thanks for Dear Nadya Yousef for correcting the word pronounciation (pronouncation) and the word letter (lerrer).
***
And here is to prepare for the translation in Dutch:
No Vowels. (No: A - E - I - O - U - Y).
Each letter is silent.
All letters are silent. (A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z).
Let us take the letter (F):
Is it (F) a silent letter?
Yes it (F) is a silent letter.
Can it (F) be pronouced alone?
No, it (F) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Eff) is saying the name of the letter (F).
So the word (Eff) is not the pronounciation of the letter (F).
saying (Fa) is a pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Fe) is a pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Fo) is a pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Far); the two letters (Fa) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Fed); the two letters (Fe) are to express the pronouciation of the letter (F) accompgnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Ford); the two letters (Fo) are to express the pronounciation of the letter (F) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (H):
Is it (H) a silent letter?
Yes it (H) is a silent letter.
Can it (H) be pronouced alone?
No, it (H) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Etch) is saying the name of the letter (H).
So the word (Etch) is not the pronouncation of the letter (H).
saying (Ha) is a pronouncation of the letter (H) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (He) is a pronouncation of the letter (H) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Ho) is a pronouncation of the letter (H) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Hat); the two letters (Ha) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (H) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Her); the two letters (He) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (H) accompgnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Hot); the two letters (Ho) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (H) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (L):
Is it (L) a silent letter?
Yes it (L) is a silent lerrer.
Can it (L) be pronouced alone?
No, it (L) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Ell) is saying the name of the letter (L).
So the word (Ell) is not the pronouncation of the letter (L).
saying (La) is a pronouncation of the letter (L) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Le) is a pronouncation of the letter (L) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Lo) is a pronouncation of the letter (L) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Lap); the two letters (La) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (L) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Led); the two letters (Le) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (L) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Lord); the two letters (Lo) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (L) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (M):
Is it (M) a silent letter?
Yes it (M) is a silent lerrer.
Can it (M) be pronouced alone?
No, it (M) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Emm) is saying the name of the letter (M).
So the word (Emm) is not the pronouncation of the letter (M).
saying (Ma) is a pronouncation of the letter (M) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Me) is a pronouncation of the letter (M) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Mo) is a pronouncation of the letter (M) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Man); the two letters (Ma) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (M) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Men); the two letters (Me) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (M) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Most); the two letters (Mo) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (M) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (N):
Is it (N) a silent letter?
Yes it (N) is a silent lerrer.
Can it (N) be pronouced alone?
No, it (N) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Enn) is saying the name of the letter (N).
So the word (Enn) is not the pronouncation of the letter (N).
saying (Na) is a pronouncation of the letter (N) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Ne) is a pronouncation of the letter (N) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (No) is a pronouncation of the letter (N) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Nab); the two letters (Na) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (N) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Neck); the two letters (Ne) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (N) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Not); the two letters (No) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (N) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (S):
Is it (S) a silent letter?
Yes it (S) is a silent lerrer.
Can it (S) be pronouced alone?
No, it (S) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Ess) is saying the name of the letter (S).
So the word (Ess) is not the pronouncation of the letter (S).
Saying (Sa) is a pronouncation of the letter (S) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Se) is a pronouncation of the letter (S) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (So) is a pronouncation of the letter (S) accompagned with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Sad); the two letters (Sa) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (S) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Set); the two letters (Se) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (S) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Sort); the two letters (So) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (S) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (W):
Is it (W) a silent letter?
Yes it (W) is a silent lerrer.
Can it (W) be pronouced alone?
No, it (W) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Dubble u) is saying the name of the letter (W).
So the word (Double u) is not the pronouncation of the letter (W).
saying (Wa) is a pronouncation of the letter (W) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (We) is a pronouncation of the letter (W) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Wo) is a pronouncation of the letter (W) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Wax); the two letters (Wa) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (W) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Web); the two letters (We) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (W) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Word); the two letters (Wo) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (W) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
Let us take the letter (Z):
Is it (Z) a silent letter?
Yes it (Z) is a silent lerrer.
Can it (Z) be pronouced alone?
No, it (Z) cannot be pronounced alone. Try?. In vain!
Saying the word (Zedd) is saying the name of the letter (Z).
So the word (Zedd) is not the pronouncation of the letter (Z).
saying (Za) is a pronouncation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-1.
Saying (Ze) is a pronouncation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-2.
Saying (Zo) is a pronouncation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with a sound. Let us call it sound-3.
And so on.
During the past up to now in a word like (Zap); the two letters (Za) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with the sound-1. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Zest); the two letters (Ze) are to express the pronoucation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with the sound-2. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
During the past up to now in a word like (Zord); the two letters (Zo) are to express the pronouncation of the letter (Z) accompagnied with the sound-3. But it is not suppose to be like that because we write two letters while it is only one letter and a sound which is not a letter so it is not to be expressed as a letter while it has to be expressed with a symbol.
And so on.
Now let us take the word - Apple - and compare it with the word - Far - .. so, the first letter of the word - Far - is the letter - F -accompagnied with the sound-1, and the wrong dealing with this word was by adding the letter - A - to express the sound-1. While the first letter of the word Apple is the letter - A - accompagnied with the same sound-1 and not with a letter - A - to express the vowel-1, otherwise the word - Apple - was supposeto be - AApple with the first letter - A - like the first letter - F - of the word - Far - and the second letter -A - in the word - AApple - to express the sound-1 like the second letter of the word - Far - which is to express the sound-1 by mistake.
So the word - Apple - is correct without adding an assumed sound-1 and the word - Far - is to be - Fr - with a simbol forthe first letter - F -.
(Let us take the word -End (not .. EEnd) -which is without adding a letter to express the sound-2
Let us take the word - Orange (Not .. OOrange) - which is without adding a letter to express the sound-3
***
Now .. Now .. Now ...
All the system of English has to be developed by writing the letters as letters and expressing the sound-1 with a symbol.
All the system of English has to be developed by writing the letters as letters and expressing the sound-2 with a symbol.
All the system of English has to be developed by writing the letters as letters and expressing the sound-3 with a symbol.
And so on.
No Vowels (No: A E I O U Y).
Each letter is silent.
All letters are silent (A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z).
Mohamed Ben Hassan Ben Mahmoud Ben Moustafa Ben Ahmed Ben Ahmed Albadawy
محمد بن حسن بن محمود بن مصطفى بن احمد بن احمد البدوي
Published 03 december 2017 Sunday 14.03.1439
Edited 03 december 2017 Sunday 14.03.1439
Note:
I accept any seious translating corrections. Please contact [email protected]
***
